Standen 2011
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants | Study took place in the UK 27 participants: 17 intervention, 10 control Inclusion criteria: 18 years or over, no longer receiving any other intensive rehabilitation and still had residual upper limb dysfunction Exclusion criteria: failure to meet above criteria Mean (SD) age: intervention group 59 (12.03), control group 63 (14.6) years 59% male Timing post stroke: intervention group mean (SD) 38 (41.28) weeks, control group 24 (36.26) weeks |
|
| Interventions | Virtual reality intervention: virtual glove which translates the position of the hand into gameplay. Participants were instructed to use the program at home Control intervention: usual care (no specific intervention) Sessions were 20 minutes, 3 times a day for 8 weeks (approximately 52 hours) |
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes recorded at baseline, 4 weeks and post‐intervention (8 weeks) Upper limb function outcome: Wolf Motor Function Test, Nine Hole Peg Test Other: Motor Activity Log Activity outcomes: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADL) |
|
| Notes | — | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerised random number generator |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Managed externally |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinded to allocation |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Large number of drop outs in the intervention group |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Unpublished data obtained via personal communication |