Sucar 2009
| Methods | Quasi RCT | |
| Participants | Recruited from the National Institute of Neurology in Mexico City, Mexico 22 participants: 11 intervention, 11 control Inclusion criteria: ≥ 6 months after stroke Exclusion criteria: none reported Mean age: intervention group 51 years, control group 52 years Timing post stroke: intervention group 22 months, control group 26 months |
|
| Interventions | Virtual reality intervention: participants used a 'Gesture Therapy' program designed by the researchers. Movements of the participant's upper limbs are tracked by a camera and the person interacts with on‐screen games. Games included shopping in the supermarket, making breakfast, playing basketball, cleaning, painting and driving Control intervention: a variety of exercises guided by the therapist using equipment such as cones and balls Sessions were 60 minutes, 3 times a week for 5 weeks (15 hours total) |
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes recorded at baseline and post‐intervention Upper limb function and activity outcomes (arm): Fugl Meyer UE scale, Motricity Index Adverse events reported Other outcomes: level of interest, competence, effort, pressure and utility of the intervention |
|
| Notes | — | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Alternate allocation based on odd or even numbers |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There were no missing data |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No additional outcomes were collected |