Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):426–435. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00699

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

DIA readouts compared to protein concentrations by SRM. DIA vs SRM-based analysis of the same peptide showed a good agreement between the methods (A) TUBB3 with peptide ISVYYNEASSHK (r2=0.80). The shaded area contains samples with TUBB3 expression below the cutoff indicating likely taxane resistance. (B) EGFR with peptide IPLENLQIIR (r2=0.70). Samples in the shaded area express EGFR above the median concentration by SRM.