Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 6;2015(2):CD009944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009944.pub2

3. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis for T1a versus T1b gastric tumors.

Variable Category Studies Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) P value*
Sample size >100 8 0.90 (0.84 to 0.96) 0.67 (0.50 to 0.85) 0.49
<100 12 0.85 (0.76 to 0.93) 0.79 (0.67 to 0.91)
Year of publication 2000 or later 11 0.90 (0.84 to 0.95) 0.70 (0.55 to 0.85) 0.59
before 2000 9 0.84 (0.75 to 0.94) 0.79 (0.66 to 0.93)
Country Western 1 1.00 (0.40 to 1.00) 1.00 (0.69 to 1.00) N/A
Eastern 19 0.88 (0.81 to 0.92) 0.73 (0.61 to 0.82)
EUS array Radial 18 0.89 (0.82 to 0.93) 0.72 (0.59 to 0.82) N/A
Linear 1 0.50 (0.07 to 0.93) 0.88 (0.64 to 0.99)
Tumor site Cardia region 1 0.50 (0.07 to 0.93) 0.88 (0.64 to 0.99) N/A
Any site 19 0.88 (0.82 to 0.92) 0.74 (0.61 to 0.83)
Quality High 18 0.84 (0.79 to 0.89) 0.75 (0.64 to 0.86) 0.05
Low 2 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.64 (0.26 to 1.00)

CI: confidence interval
 EUS: endoscopic ultrasonography
 *P values are from likelihood ratio test for model with and without the covariate, to identify diagnostic performance differences across variable categories.