Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD003241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003241.pub2

Yan 2005.

Methods Design: Single‐blind randomised controlled trial with 3 groups, 2 of which are relevant to and included in this review. 
 Randomisation: Jensen's computerised method of minimisation to one of three groups. Participants allocated after giving informed consent. 
 Dropouts: n = 4. 
 From experimental group, gastric bleeding, n = 1; could not undergo assessment, n = 1. 
 From control group, another stroke, n = 1; discharged early, n = 1.
Participants n = 32 
 Experimental: n = 15 recruited and 13 completed, 7 male and 6 female, 7 right and 6 left hemiplegia. Mean age 68.2 (SD 7.7) years, mean time after stroke 8.7 (SD 5.8) days. 
 Control: n = 17 recruited and 15 completed, 7 male and 6 female, 6 right and 9 left hemiplegia. Mean age 73.3 (SD 8.1) years, mean time after stroke 10.1 (SD 2.8) days. 
 Study criteria: (1) unilateral stroke within carotid artery system according to CT; (2) aged 45 to 85 years; (3) independent in daily activities before stroke; (4) no brain stem or cerebellar lesions; (5) no medical comorbidity; (6) no cognitive impairment (scored 7 or above on abbreviated mental test).
Interventions Duration: 3 weeks. 
 Experimental: 
 Category = 7. 
 FES provided by 2 dual channel stimulators connected with a program timer to form one stimulating unit for FES. Surface electrodes were placed on quadriceps, hamstrings, Tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius with participants in side‐lying with paretic lower limb supported in a sling. Intervention was provided for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Stimulation consisted of 0.3ms pulses given at 30 Hz using the maximum intensity tolerated using an activation sequence that mimicked normal gait. 
 Control: 
 Placebo FES. 
 Stimulation provided from an electrical stimulation device with a disconnected circuit. The treatment frequency and period were identical to experimental FES except that stimulation was provided for 60 minutes per day. Participants were told that they might or might not feel the stimulation.
Outcomes Baseline measurement: 
 Before treatment. 
 Outcome measurement: 
 End of treatment period i.e. 3 weeks. 
 Included outcomes: 
 (1) peak torque during maximum isometric voluntary contraction of ankle dorsiflexors; (2) co‐contraction ratio of agonist and antagonist [(area of antagonist/area of agonist + angaonist) x 100]; (3) timed up and go test; Other outcomes: 
 (1) percentage of participants able to walk; (2) composite spasticity score.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear

Electrostimulation category key is given in Additional Table 01 
 9HPT: Nine Hole Peg Test 
 ADL: activities of daily living 
 ARAT: Action Research Arm Test 
 CT: computerised tomography 
 CVA: cerebrovascular accident 
 EMG: electromyography 
 ES: electrical stimulation 
 FES: functional electrical stimulation 
 FIM: functional independence measure 
 fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging 
 GP: general practitioner 
 MI: myocardial infarction 
 MRC: Medical Research Council 
 PNF: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation 
 SD: standard deviation 
 TENS: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation 
 vs: versus