Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD001543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001543.pub4

Thapar 2000.

Methods Single centre, two arms RCT of Shouldice vs Moloney's Darn. 
 Randomization: generation sequence: Unclear; allocation concealment: randomizations just before skin incision. 
 Maximum follow up: 2 years. 
 Exclusions after randomizations: no. 
 Losses to follow up: none. 
 Jadad quality score: 2.
Participants Country: India. 
 Setting: centre not specialized in hernia repair. 
 Total enrolled patients: 50 (25 Shouldice vs 25 Moloney's darn). 
 Age range: 18‐40. 
 Gender: 50 M. 
 Inclusion criteria: age >18. 
 Exclusion criteria: bilaterality, recurrent hernias and inguinoscrotal pathologies 
 Demographic and baseline data: comparability for side and type of hernia (data reported).
Interventions Shouldice standard (n=25). 4 layers. unabsorbable suture. 
 Moloney's darn (n=25). 2 layers. unabsorbable suture.
Outcomes Recurrence (lump in groin not necessarily re operated). 
 Lenght of postoperative stay. 
 Wound infection. 
 Haematoma.
Notes Conflict of interest: not reported. 
 Sources of funding: not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate