Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;2015(10):CD004433. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004433.pub3

Yoon 2014.

Methods Randomisation by random card
Blinded outcome assessor
No information about withdrawals
Single centre, inpatients
Participants Korea
Recruited from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
26 participants: 9 intervention, 9 control, 8 arm restraint plus mirror therapy
Inclusion criteria: 10° of active wrist extension, 10° of active thumb abduction/extension and 10° active extension in at least 2 additional digits; possibility of simple communication; patients who could maintain a sitting position for more than 30 minutes
Exclusion criteria: depression; inability to co‐operate in the treatment; inability to perform the active task training for musculoskeletal problems; spasticity; complex regional pain syndrome or secondary adhesive capsulitis
Mean age (SD): intervention group: 64.33 (8.54) years, control group: 60.56 (16.94) years, arm restraint plus mirror therapy group 47.36 (14.4) years
 % women: intervention group 33%, control group: 55%, arm restraint plus mirror therapy group 25%
Stroke details: ischaemic or haemorrhagic; 67% with right hemiparesis in treatment group, 44% with right hemiparesis in control group; 62% with right hemiparesis in arm restraint plus mirror therapy group
Time since stroke, mean (SD): intervention group 0.6 (0.3) months, control group 0.8 (0.4) months, arm restraint plus mirror therapy group 0.8 (0.38) months
Interventions This trial had 3 arms: the intervention group performed CIMT; a comparison group performed CIMT plus mirror therapy; and the control group
CIMT versus CIMT plus mirror therapy versus control
CIMT: fine motor exercise under the supervision of occupational therapist plus conventional physiotherapy plus self exercise
 Amount of restraint: 6 hours per day
Anatomical region restraint: arm plus hand
CIMT plus mirror therapy: fine motor exercise under the supervision of occupational therapist plus conventional physiotherapy plus mirror therapy with flexion/extension of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger, and pronation/supination of the forearm
Control: self‐exercise program
Session duration:
CIMT: 6 hours of exercise, plus 40 minutes of conventional physiotherapy plus 30 minutes of self exercise daily;
CIMT plus mirror therapy: 6 hours of exercise, plus 40 minutes of conventional physiotherapy, plus 30 minutes of mirror therapy daily;
Control group: 60 minutes of self exercise, plus 40 minutes of conventional physiotherapy
All for 5 days a week for 2 weeks
Outcomes Measures pre/post treatment
  • Arm motor function: WMFT

  • Dexterity: 9HPT, Box and Block Test

  • Motor impairment: grip force

  • Activities of daily living measure: BI (Korean version)

  • Arm motor impairment: FMA

  • Brunnstrom stage

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "they were assigned into three groups by picking a random card with numbers on them"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "... the results were compared between the three groups by the blinded observers"
Incomplete outcome data addressed? (Post‐treatment) Unclear risk The study provided no information about withdrawals

9HPT: Nine‐Hole Peg Test, a test measuring finger‐hand co‐ordination in terms of the time it takes a patient to place nine pegs in a 5‐in by 5‐in board then remove them

16HPT: Sixteen‐Hole Peg Test: the time needed to place 16 pegs (2.15.9 cm) in a pegboard with 16 holes determined with a stopwatch

ADL: activities of daily living

AMAT: Arm Motor Activity Test, 16 timed items

AMPS: Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a real‐time test in which patients do prescribed functional tasks that are videotaped and scored by a viewer

AoU: amount of use

ARAT: Action Research Arm Test, 19 items, 57‐point test divided into four categories (grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement), each item graded on a 4‐point ordinal scale (anchored 0 = can perform no part of the test, 3 = performs the test normally)

BAT: Bilateral arm training

BATRAC: Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing

BI: Barthel Index

BLMA: Birgitta Lindmarks Motor Assessment

Box and Block Test: assesses unilateral gross manual dexterity

CI: control intervention

CIMT: constraint‐induced movement therapy

CIT: constraint‐induced therapy

CMII: Chedoke‐McMaster Impairment Inventory, a 7‐point scale ranging from 1 to 7 that presents 7 stages of motor recovery for arm, hand, postural control and shoulder pain, assessed with a severity scale

COPM: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, a structured clinical assessment that allows participants to self‐rate goals of therapy in the categories of self‐care, productivity, and leisure

CVA: Cerebrovascular accident

dCIT: distributed constraint‐induced therapy

EMF: Emory Motor Function test, 16 timed items (2 strength items and 1 quality of movement item)

EmNSA: Erasmus modification of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment to measure the sense of touch, pressure, proprioception, and sharp‐blunt discrimination in the upper limb

FAI: Frenchay Activities Index, a self‐report scale, measures a person's perception of instrumental ADL participation at 3 or 6 months. It contains 15 items that can be separated into 3 factors: domestic chores, leisure/work, and outdoor activities. Each item is scored on a 0 to 3 point scale. Higher scores indicate better performance.

FIM: Functional Independence Measure, 5 items that specifically assess upper extremity function. Each item is scored on a 7‐point ordinal scale

FIM2: Functional Independence Measure, 18 items grouped into six sub scales. Each item is scored on a 7‐point ordinal scale

FIM3: Functional Independence Measure, 6 items that specifically assess upper extremity function. Each item is scored on a 7‐point ordinal scale

FMA: Fugl‐Meyer Assessment, a 66‐point upper extremity section of the Fugl‐Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke which assesses impairment using a 3‐point ordinal scale ( 0 = cannot perform to 2 = can perform fully)

FMA2: Fugl‐Meyer Assessment, a 33‐point upper extremity section of the Fugl‐Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke Assessment, which assesses impairment using a 3‐point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform to 2 = can perform fully)

FU: Forced use

GPT: Grooved Pegboard Test, a test of dexterity that evaluates the speed with which the patient grasps and inserts 25 pegs (3 cm long, 5 mm diameter) into a grid of vertical holes in a horizontal 10 cm2 surface. It indicates the number of pegs placed per second for each hand

MAL: Motor Activity Log, a semi‐structured interview comprising 30 ADL tasks graded on a 6‐point AoU scale and a 6‐point Quality of Movement (QoM) scale

MAL2: Motor Activity Log, a semi‐structured interview comprising 14 ADL tasks graded on a 6‐point AoU scale and a 6‐point Quality of Movement (QoM) scale

MAL3: Motor Activity Log, a semi‐structured interview comprising 28 ADL tasks graded on a 6‐point AoU scale and a 6‐point Quality of Movement (QoM) scale

MAS: Motor Assessment Scale, a performance‐based scale developed for assessing everyday motor function in patients with stroke. Eight areas of motor function are assessed using a 7‐point scale (0 to 6)

MAS2: Modified Motor Assessment Scale, items used for upper extremity only; both arms were tested, consisting of 15 tasks from gross arm to fine finger movements in a 0–5 point scale

MASh: Modified Ashworth Scale, grades spasticity on the International Classification of Functioning level of body functions (muscle tone functions)

mCIMT: modified constraint‐induced movement therapy

MESUPES: Motor Evaluation Scale for Arm in Stroke Patients, a scale that takes the quality of upper limb movement into account during the evaluation of arm performance after stroke

MFT: Manual Function Test, assess various functions of the paralysed upper limb in hemiplegic patients post stroke in performing simple tasks

MI: Motricity Index, to measure strength in the upper limbs

MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination

NIHSS: The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. assesses cognitive, sensory, and motor impairments as an indicator of overall stroke severity

PET: positron emission tomography

PNF: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation

RMAAS: Rivermead Motor Assessment Arm Scale: motor performance test

SD: standard deviation

SHFT: Sollerman Hand Function Test, consisting of 20 sub‐tests reflecting daily hand activities (type of grasp, quality of movement and speed of performance assessed in a 0–4 point scale)

SIS: Stroke Impact Scale

TC: Therapeutic climbing

TF: Traditional physiotherapy

TMS: transcranical magnetic stimulation

UE: upper extremity

WMFT: Wolf Motor Function Test, 17 simple limb movements and tasks with the affected arm. 15 items are timed and two assess strength

WMFT2: Wolf Motor Function Test, 19 simple limb movements and tasks with the affected arm. 17 items are timed and two assess strength