Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 8;2017(1):CD003430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003430.pub2

Comparison 6. Ispaghula husk versus control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of participants with at least one recurrent adenoma 1 376 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.45 [1.01, 2.08]
2 Number of participants with at least one adenoma 1 cm or greater 1 376 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.80 [0.55, 5.87]
3 Number of participants with at least one adverse effect 1 376 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.18, 4.40]