Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 8;2017(1):CD003430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003430.pub2

Schatzkin 2000.

Methods Allocation: randomised
 Blindness: no
 Duration: 4 years (with a further follow‐up after an additional 4 years)
Setting: 8 clinical centres, USA
Participants Inclusion criteria: ≥ 1 large bowel adenoma removed within 6 months, polyp‐free colon post colonoscopy, age ≥ 35 years
 Exclusion criteria: CRC, bowel resection, IBD, FAP, weight > 150% of recommended, lipid‐lowering drugs
 N = 2079
Sex: % male (intervention/control) 65.8/63.2
Age: mean (intervention/control) 61.0/61.1
Baseline dietary fibre intake g/d: not reported
Baseline characteristics similar for each group: yes
Interventions
  1. Treatment: dietary targets of 20% of calories from fat, 18 g of dietary fibre/1000 kcal, and 5‐8 servings of fruits and vegetables/d. Over 50 h of dietary counselling. N = 1037

  2. Control: general dietary guidelines with no additional information provided. N = 1042

Outcomes Adenoma recurrence
Colorectal cancer occurrence
Adenoma size
Multiple adenomas
Notes
  1. Colonoscopy +/‐ polypectomy at 1 and 4 years after randomisation.

  2. Adenoma defined as recurrent if it was found during any endoscopic procedure after the 1‐year colonoscopy

  3. Treatment group reduced fat intake to approximately 25% of calories, doubled fibre intake to 30‐35 g/d

  4. Adverse effects not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation stratified by clinical centre. Assignment done by a computer programme
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants were aware of treatment regimens.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Participants were aware of allocation, but were told not to tell the endoscopist.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Reasons for loss to follow‐up were reported, 174 out of 2079 participants (8.4%) dropped out from the study.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measured outcomes were reported.
Other bias Unclear risk None identified

BC: beta carotene
 CRC: colorectal cancer
 IBD: inflammatory bowel disease
 FAP: familial adenomatous polyposis
 ITT: intention‐to‐treat
 RCT: randomised controlled trial
 WBF: wheat bran fibre