Schatzkin 2000.
Methods | Allocation: randomised
Blindness: no
Duration: 4 years (with a further follow‐up after an additional 4 years) Setting: 8 clinical centres, USA |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: ≥ 1 large bowel adenoma removed within 6 months, polyp‐free colon post colonoscopy, age ≥ 35 years
Exclusion criteria: CRC, bowel resection, IBD, FAP, weight > 150% of recommended, lipid‐lowering drugs
N = 2079 Sex: % male (intervention/control) 65.8/63.2 Age: mean (intervention/control) 61.0/61.1 Baseline dietary fibre intake g/d: not reported Baseline characteristics similar for each group: yes |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes | Adenoma recurrence Colorectal cancer occurrence Adenoma size Multiple adenomas |
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation stratified by clinical centre. Assignment done by a computer programme |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants were aware of treatment regimens. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Participants were aware of allocation, but were told not to tell the endoscopist. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Reasons for loss to follow‐up were reported, 174 out of 2079 participants (8.4%) dropped out from the study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All measured outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | None identified |
BC: beta carotene CRC: colorectal cancer IBD: inflammatory bowel disease FAP: familial adenomatous polyposis ITT: intention‐to‐treat RCT: randomised controlled trial WBF: wheat bran fibre