Table 1.
Anti-Nipah G IgG responses
| Multiple comparisons: uncorrected Fisher’s LSD | Summary | Individual P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Male:LIVE NIPARAB | *** | 0.0009 |
| Male:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Male:INAC BNSP333 | **** | <0.0001 |
| Male:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Females:LIVE NIPARAB | ** | 0.0031 |
| Male:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Females:INAC BNSP333 | **** | <0.0001 |
| Male:LIVE NIPARAB | vs. | Females:INAC NIPARAB | **** | <0.0001 |
| Male:INAC BNSP333 | vs. | Females:INAC NIPARAB | **** | <0.0001 |
| Male:INAC BNSP333 | vs. | Females:LIVE NIPARAB | * | 0.036 |
| Females:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Females:LIVE NIPARAB | **** | <0.0001 |
| Females:INAC NIPARAB | vs. | Females:INAC BNSP333 | **** | <0.0001 |
| Females:LIVE NIPARAB | vs. | Females:INAC BNSP333 | * | 0.0361 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001