Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;4:15. doi: 10.1038/s41541-019-0109-5

Table 3.

Anti-Nipah G IgG isotype responses

Multiple comparisons: uncorrected Fisher’s LSD Summary Individual P value
IgG1:Male INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB *** 0.0002
IgG1:Male INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG1:Females INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB ** 0.0016
IgG1:Females INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG1:Male LIVE NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG1:Male LIVE NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG1:Females LIVE NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG1:Females LIVE NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male LIVE NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG2c:Male INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females LIVE NIPARAB *** 0.0002
IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Male LIVE NIPARAB **** <0.0001
IgG2c:Females INAC NIPARAB vs. IgG2c:Females LIVE NIPARAB **** <0.0001

**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001