Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;9:6020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42292-w

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Non-stimulated IPF lung fibroblasts show a reduced proliferative response. Proliferation in non-stimulated control (white) and IPF fibroblasts (grey) was measured 72 h using cell count (A). Time course of proliferation in PDGF-stimulated (from control (B) and IPF (C) patients). Proliferation in control (D) and IPF (E) fibroblasts at 72 h following exposure to the indicated PDGF concentrations. Data represents the mean +/− SEM of five individuals. Statistical significance was performed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Dunnett’s or Tukey’s test for time courses (AC) where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001. The logEC50 for each individual was determined in GraphPad Prism and comparison between control and IPF groups was performed using a unpaired t-test. The EC50 was calculated from the mean logEC50 values.