Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population (n = 5,199) and descriptive information regarding the physical and social environment in neighbourhoods
Sociodemographic characteristics | n | Mean (SD) or percentages |
---|---|---|
Age in years | 5,149 | 52.2 (16.3) |
Sex (% female) | 5,148 | 55.3 |
Educational level (% higher) | 4,703 | 54.1 |
Length of residency (10 years or more) | 4,994 | 65.0 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 4,614 | 25.2 (4.5) |
Overweight status (% BMI ≥25.0) | 4,614 | 45.3 |
Physical neighbourhood factors (range) | ||
Neighbourhood-level RAD (% high) | 5,199 | 49.6 |
Presence of recreational facilities*, 1 (3–7) | 5,199 | 4.8 (1.1) |
Features of the active transportation environment*, 1 (7–19) | 5,199 | 12.6 (2.8) |
Neighbourhood aesthetics*, 1 (6–17) | 5,199 | 11.5 (2.4) |
mRFEI (0–100) | 4,942 | 43.2 (24.4) |
Social neighbourhood factors | ||
Social network construct*, 2 | 4,790 | 10.4 (3.7) |
First tertile (social network score <9) | 1,545 | 32.3 |
Second tertile (social network score ≥9 and ≤12) | 1,837 | 38.4 |
Third tertile (social network score >12) | 1,408 | 29.4 |
Social cohesion construct*, 2 | 4,758 | 17.4 (3.6) |
First tertile (social cohesion score <16) | 1,284 | 27.0 |
Second tertile (social cohesion score ≥16 and ≤19) | 2,067 | 43.4 |
Third tertile (social cohesion score >19) | 1,407 | 29.6 |
Social trust*, 2 | 4,891 | 3.5 (0.9) |
Strongly disagree | 204 | 4.2 |
Disagree | 342 | 7.0 |
Neither agree or disagree | 1,591 | 32.5 |
Agree | 2,299 | 47.0 |
Strongly agree | 455 | 9.3 |
Neighbourhood SES (% high) | 5,199 | 50.4 |
Perceived crime*, 2 | 4,819 | 3.4 (1.1) |
Strongly disagree | 664 | 13.8 |
Disagree | 1,712 | 35.5 |
Neither agree or disagree | 1,544 | 32.0 |
Agree | 581 | 12.1 |
Strongly agree | 318 | 6.6 |
Individual sum scores.
Higher scores indicate a more activity-friendly neighbourhood.
Higher scores indicate more social networks, or higher social trust, or social cohesion, or perceived crime. BMI, body mass index measured in kg/m2; RAD, residential area density; mRFEI, modified retail food environment index calculated by dividing the number of healthy food outlets by the total number of healthy and unhealthy food outlets and multiplying this by 100; SES, socio-economic status.