Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;12(1):67–77. doi: 10.1159/000496626

Table 4.

Joint effects of age and body fat distribution pattern on renal function impairment in men and women

Group/type Patients, Renal function OR (95% CI)
n impairment, n (%) model 1 model 2
Men <45 years of age
 Non-obese 5,197 127 (2.4) Reference Reference
 Peripheral obese 620 20 (3.2) 1.33 (0.82–2.15) 0.86 (0.51–1.46)
 Central obese 2,906 170 (5.8) 2.48 (1.96–3.14)* 1.04 (0.79–1.36)
Men ≥45 years of age
 Non-obese 3,423 175 (5.1) Reference Reference
 Peripheral obese 39 2 (5.1) 1.00 (0.24–4.20) 0.80 (0.18–3.62)
 Central obese 2,344 237 (10.1) 2.09 (1.70–2.56)* 1.42 (1.14–1.78)*
Women <45 years of age
 Non-obese 2,446 74 (3.0) Reference Reference
 Peripheral obese 3,465 121 (3.5) 1.16 (0.86–1.56) 0.93 (0.68–1.28)
 Central obese 72a 13 (18.1) 7.06 (3.71–13.44)* 3.14 (1.52–6.49)*
Women ≥45 years of age
 Non-obese 742 36 (4.9) Reference Reference
 Peripheral obese 3,378 266 (7.9) 1.68 (1.17–2.40)* 1.06 (0.73–1.55)
 Central obese 458 93 (20.3) 5.00 (3.33–7.49)* 2.04 (1.31–3.16)*

Model definitions are: model 1, unadjusted analysis; model 2, adjusted for mean arterial pressure, fasting glucose and hsCRP level, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG/HDL-C. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride.

*

p value <0.05.

a

Patient number is far less than reference.