Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;7(5):e655–e663. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30075-0

Table 2.

Effect of the intervention on syphilis screening and treatment rates at the first antenatal care visit

Intervention group
Control group
Absolute difference between median proportions (95% CI) p value*
Women (n=18 357), n/N Clinics (n=13), median proportion (IQR) Women (n=17 679), n/N Clinics (n=13), median proportion (IQR)
Primary outcomes
Women screened for syphilis 18 314/18 357 99·9% (99·0 to 100·0) 17 036/17 679 93·8% (85·0 to 98·9) 6·1% (1·1 to 14·1) 0·00092
Women treated (proportion of those positive for syphilis) 889/894 100·0% (99·7 to 100·0) 534/991 43·2% (2·6 to 83·2) 56·8% (12·8 to 99·0) 0·0028
Secondary outcomes
Women screened for anaemia at their first clinic visit 8666/18 357 50·0% (22·3 to 75·8) 8097/17 679 57·0% (27·7 to 70·5) −7·0% (−24·9 to 30·8) 0·72
Women screened for proteinuria at their first clinic visit 2171/18 355 0·8% (0·3 to 7·2) 1458/17 677 0·1% (0·0 to 1·8) 0·7% (−0·2 to 6·3) 0·22
Women screened for HIV at their first clinic visit 15 422/18 320 86·5% (78·1 to 90·5) 14 189/17 678 81·1% (68·4 to 84·8) 5·4% (−2·4 to 15·9) 0·10
*

Wilcoxon rank sum test.

The clinic is the unit of analysis.

For three clinics in the control group in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the proportion of women screened positive for syphilis who were treated at the first visit could not be calculated because the clinic had no women who were positive for syphilis.