Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;16(6):1043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061043

Table 4.

Presence (+) and absence (−) of panicles plant−1 (and thereby grain yield) and percentage of plants per rice cultivar and treatment without any panicle. Cultivars 1: Ingwizabukungu; 2: Intsindagirabigega; 3: Jyambere; 4: Mpembuke; 5 Ndamirabahinzi; 6: Nemeyubutaka; and 7: Zong geng were grown at a low or high temperature and with six different drought treatments, D0: No drought stress, DS: Drought at the seedling stage, DST: Drought at the seedling and tillering stages, DT: Drought at the tillering stage, DTR: Drought at the tillering and reproductive stages, DR: Drought at reproductive stage, DSTR: Drought at the seedling, tillering, and reproductive stages.

Treatment Cultivar Plants per Temp × Drought with No Panicles (%)
Temp Drought 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Low D0 + + - + + + + 37.1 ab
Low DS + + + - - + + 80.0 cde
Low DST + + + + + + + 57.1 bcd
Low DT + + + + - + - 74.3 cde
Low DTR + + + - + - - 74.3 cde
Low DR + + - - + - - 85.7 de
Low DSTR - + + + + + - 65.7 bcd
High D0 + + + + + + + 11.4 a
High DS + + + + - - - 74.3 cde
High DST - - - - - - - 100.0 e
High DT + + + + + + - 54.3 bcd
High DTR + + + + + + - 65.7 bcd
High DR + + + + + + - 51.4 bc
High DSTR - - - - - - - 100.0 e
Plants per cultivar with no panicles (%) 62.9 ab 50.0 a 61.4 ab 68.6 ab 72.9 bc 58.6 ab 91.4 c

Means followed by the same letters within a column for treatment or within a row for cultivar are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Tukey’s mean comparison test.