Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060937

Table 3.

Design of evidence per benefit 1.

Methodological Design Physical Health
(n = 46)
Mental Health & Well-Being
(n = 74)
Education & Lifelong Learning
(n = 57)
Active Citizenship
(n = 23)
Crime Reduction
(n = 11)
Additional Benefits
(n = 46)
Systematic reviews & Meta-analyses 4 (0/1) 6 (0/2) 1 (0/1) 1 (0/1) 1 (0/1) 1 (0/0)
Randomized Controlled Trials 5 (0/0) 10 (0/0) 4 (1/0) - - 2 (0/0)
Case-control studies 3 (0/0) 14 (0/2) 14 (0/2) - 2 (0/0) 9 (0/0)
Longitudinal studies 3 (0/0) 9 (2/2) 6 (3/1) 2 (2/0) 1 (1/0) 3 (1/1)
Cross-sectional surveys 11 (0/0) 9 (1/1) 2 (0/0) 1 (0/0) - 4 (0/1)
Case reports & qual. evaluations 9 (0/1) 18 (0/2) 20 (0/2) 16 (0/2) 4 (0/0) 16 (0/1)
Economic evaluations 2 (0/2) - - 1 (0/1) - 2 (0/2)
Non-systematic literature review 9 (0/3) 8 (0/2) 7 (0/2) 1 (0/0) 3 (0/1) 6 (0/3)
Policy statement, theoretical paper - - 3 (0/1) 1 (0/0) - 3 (0/1)

1 The number in brackets shows the number of studies that did come up through the non-systematic approach (additional studies in scientific journals/ grey literature) within the total number.