Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;10:2040620719841581. doi: 10.1177/2040620719841581

Table 4.

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of patients treated with axi-cel outside clinical trials (‘real-world experience’) with ZUMA-1.

Characteristics ZUMA-1
(Locke et al. 2018)
Nastoupil et al.88
(ASH 2018)
Jacobson et al.89
(ASH 2018)
Patients enrolled (infused), n 111 (101) 295 (274) NR (104)
Median age (range), years 58 (23–76) 60 (21–83) 63.8 (21–80)
Median follow up 27.1 months 3.9 months 5.6 months
Double-hit lymphoma NR 23% 24%
⩾ 3 lines of therapy 69% 75% NR
Primary refractoriness 26% 35% NR
Refractory to last therapy 77% 42% 91%
Prior autologous HCT 21% 33% 27%
Bridging chemotherapy 0 55% 40%
Efficacy
 Best ORR (CR) 82% (58%) 81% (57%) 71% (44%)
 Median PFS 5.9 months 6.18 months 5.6 months
 6-month OS 78% 72% NR
Toxicity
 CRS all grades (3–4) 93% (13%) 92% (7%) 94% (16%)
 Neurotoxicity all grades (3–4) 65% (31%) 69% (33%) 76% (39%)
 Tocilizumab use 45% 63% 67%
 Steroids use 29% 55% 64%
 Grade 5 AEs 4% 3%1 7%2
1

A total of 7 nonrelapse mortalities due to: infection (n = 5); hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n = 1); cerebral edema (n = 1).

2

A total of 7 nonrelapse mortalities due to: CRS (n = 2); neurotoxicity (n = 1); infection (n = 2); cardiovascular (n = 2).

AE, adverse event; ASH 2018, 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel; CR, complete response; CRS, cytokine-releasing syndrome; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; NR, not reported; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.