Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;19:77. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1451-5

Table 1.

Bacterial load of water samples, water disinfection and DWS disinfection

Broiler Farm Type of water (number of samples) Water contamination (CFU/ml) Water disinfection during production DWS disinfection during vacancy
TAC PSEUDO Frequency Disinfection product Active compound Applied concentration a Frequency Disinfection product Active compound Applied concentration
K1 Well water > 300 > 300 2–3/week DM CID (CID lines b) NaClO +KOH 0.00010% 1/round CID 2000 (CID lines) H2O2 +Acetic acid + Peracetic acid 0.050%
K2 Well water > 300 20 / c / / / 1/year MS Oxy-Clean 1.0 (MS Schippers d) H2O2 Unknown
K3 Well water (2) > 300 30 and > 300 Continuously Di-O-Clean (MS Schippers) ClO2 Week 1, 2, 3: 0.030%
Week 4, 5, 6: 0.015%
1/round Huwa-San Veterinary Applications (Sanace) H2O2 0.027%
K4 Well water 59 2 Daily Top Clean Aqua (Topturn f) H2O2 0.20% 1/round CID Clean (CID lines) H2O2 1.0%
K5 Well water (2) 6 and 102 3 and 33 Week 1 and 2 CID Clean (CID lines) H2O2 0.010% 1/round CID Clean (CID lines) H2O2 2.0%

Bacterial load of water samples taken at five broiler farms is represented as total aerobic count (TAC) and Pseudomonas count (PSEUDO). a Applied concentration of the disinfection product (not of the active compound); b CID lines, Ieper, Belgium; c /, No water disinfection applied; d MS Schippers, Arendonk, Belgium; e Sanac, Wervik, Belgium; f Topturn, Bergeijk, The Netherlands