Table 2.
CNR1 (rs7766029) |
GABRA6 (rs3219151) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stress type (within the last year) | β | S.E. | STAT | P | β | S.E. | STAT | P |
Combined population sample of Budapest and Manchester | ||||||||
RLE – relationship | -0.014 | 0.0114 | -1.185 | 0.236 | 0.003 | 0.0113 | 0.244 | 0.808 |
RLE – financial | 0.019 | 0.0156 | 1.191 | 0.234 | -0.009 | 0.0155 | -0.594 | 0.552 |
RLE – illness/personal | -0.018 | 0.0185 | -0.973 | 0.331 | 0.004 | 0.0183 | 0.232 | 0.817 |
RLE – social | -0.025 | 0.0190 | -1.332 | 0.183 | 0.010 | 0.0188 | 0.554 | 0.580 |
Budapest subsample | ||||||||
RLE – relationship | -0.015 | 0.0185 | -0.819 | 0.413 | -0.012 | 0.0181 | -0.661 | 0.509 |
RLE – financial | 0.0002 | 0.0205 | 0.011 | 0.991 | 0.004 | 0.0201 | 0.200 | 0.842 |
RLE – illness/personal | -0.040 | 0.0289 | -1.373 | 0.170 | 0.062 | 0.0283 | 2.205 | 0.028 |
RLE – social | 0.028 | 0.0300 | 0.922 | 0.357 | 0.033 | 0.0291 | 1.127 | 0.260 |
Manchester subsample | ||||||||
RLE – relationship | -0.014 | 0.0144 | -0.951 | 0.342 | 0.009 | 0.0145 | 0.596 | 0.551 |
RLE – financial | 0.029 | 0.0221 | 1.313 | 0.189 | -0.027 | 0.0222 | -1.231 | 0.219 |
RLE – illness/personal | -0.004 | 0.0241 | -0.172 | 0.864 | -0.039 | 0.0241 | -1.616 | 0.106 |
RLE – social | -0.060 | 0.0245 | -2.459 | 0.014 | -0.004 | 0.0246 | -0.169 | 0.866 |
S.E., standard error of beta; STAT, coefficient t-statistic; RLE, number of recent negative life events (within the last year); RLE – financial, financial difficulties; RLE-illness/personal, recent illness and personal problems; RLE – relationship, intimate relationship problems; RLE – social, social network disturbances. We tested additive linear regression models. The effect allele is T in case of CNR1 rs7766029, and C in case of GABRA6 rs3219151. In the combined population sample of Budapest and Manchester there were no significant p-Values. Significant p-values (< 0.05) are marked in bold.