Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;7(3):e2138. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002138

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The pH (±SEM) in the lipoaspirate treated with SB (blue) was significantly higher compared to that in the lipoaspirate treated with standard tumescent solution (green; 6.81 ± 0.06 vs. 6.67 ± 0.03). * indicates statistically significant differences (P = 0.04) between lipoaspirate with SB and lipoaspirate without SB.