Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;10:299. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00299

Table 1.

Results of ultrasonic stiffness evaluation (stiffness index, SI) at the tubular aortic level.

Reference BAV
Control
N Age (years) Tubular aorta (mm) Aortic SI (No. unit) N Age (years) Tubular aorta (mm) Aortic SI (no unit)
Oulego-Erroz et al., 2013 24 6.5 ± 5.0 20.1 7.2 ± 4.5 24 7.0 ± 5.0 16.3 ± 3.5 4.1 ± 2.3
Weismann et al., 2016 50 10.9 (0.2–20.2) Not provided 3.5 (1.4–7.5) 50 11 (0.3–17.9) Not provided 2.8 (1.5–4.6)
Santarpia et al., 2012 40 20.9 ± 4.7 30 ± 0.5 6.4 ± 3.5 40 23.4 ± 3.4 2.6 ± 0.3 3.9 ± 1.2
Nistri et al., 2008 127 23 ± 10 29.9 ± 5.3 7.5 ± 5.0 114 21 ± 10 23.8 ± 4.4 3.6 ± 1.89
Drapisz et al., 2013 20 27 (24–33) 31 (28–38) 8.9 (6.5–10.1) 20 30 (25–33) 26 (24–30) 3.7 (2.5–4.6)
Schaefer et al., 2007 29 (1LR) 43 (1LR) 32.2 ± 5.1 (1LR) 6.4 (1LR)
29 (1NR) 39 (1NR) 31.8 ± 6.4 (1NR) 9.6 (1NR)
Li et al., 2016 28 (non-dilated), 41 28.2 ± 4.9, 8.3 ± 4.9, 29 42 ± 11 26.4 ± 3.5 5.2 ± 2.7
29 (dilated) 49 41.0 ± 5.3 19.7 ± 14.1
Goudot et al., 2018a 108 48.8 ± 16.6 39.7 ± 8.6 20.4 ± 31.3 148 45.6 ± 17.4 30.2 ± 5.4 12.7 ± 14.8

Reference order is presented depending on the age of the population studied.