Table 2.
Inter-judge reliability analysis of the CMASP (N = 503 speaking turns).
| CMASP | 1st session (n = 220) | 2nd session (n = 283) | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93∗∗ | 94∗∗ | 93.50∗∗ | 0.71∗∗ |
| Verbal Mode-Structural Form (VeM-SF) | 95∗∗ | 95∗∗ | 95.00∗∗ | 0.00∗∗ |
| Courtesies (SF1) | 96∗ | TANC | ||
| Assertion (SF2) | 93∗ | 92∗ | 92.50∗ | 0.01∗ |
| Question (SF3) | 95∗ | 94∗ | 94.50∗ | 0.01∗ |
| Agreement (SF4) | 92∗ | 95∗ | 93.50∗ | 0.02∗ |
| Denial (SF5) | TANC | 79∗ | ||
| Direction (SF6) | TANC | TANC | ||
| Verbal Mode-Communicative Intent (VeM-CI) | 87∗∗ | 92∗∗ | 89.50∗∗ | 3.54∗∗ |
| Acknowledging (CI1) | 93∗ | 97∗ | 95.00∗ | 0.03∗ |
| Informing (CI2) | 65∗ | TANC | ||
| Exploring (CI3) | 86∗ | 86∗ | 86.00∗ | 0.00∗ |
| Deepening (CI4) | 75∗ | 82∗ | 78.50∗ | 0.05∗ |
| Focusing (CI5) | 79∗ | 82∗ | 80.50∗ | 0.02∗ |
| Temporizing (CI6) | TANC | TANC | ||
| Attuning (CI7) | 70∗ | 90∗ | 80.00∗ | 0.14∗ |
| Resignifying (CI8) | 100∗ | 82∗ | 91.00∗ | 0.13∗ |
| Vocal Mode (VoM) | 93∗∗ | 87∗∗ | 90.00∗∗ | 4.24∗∗ |
| Reporting (VM1) | 100∗ | TANC | ||
| Connected (VM2) | 87∗ | 89∗ | 88.00∗ | 0.01∗ |
| Declarative (VM3) | 75∗ | 77∗ | 76.00∗ | 0.01∗ |
| Introspective (VM4) | 80∗ | 100∗ | 90.00∗ | 0.14∗ |
| Emotional-Positive (VM5) | 83∗ | 85∗ | 84.00∗ | 0.01∗ |
| Emotional-Negative (VM6) | 88∗ | 61∗ | 74.50∗ | 0.19∗ |
| Pure Positive Emotion (VM7) | 100∗ | 100∗ | 100.00∗ | 0.00∗ |
| Pure Negative Emotion (VM8) | TANC | TANC | ||
| Interruption Mode (IM) | 81∗∗ | 92∗∗ | 86.50∗∗ | 7.78∗∗ |
| Cooperative-Concurrence (IM1) | 89∗ | 96∗ | 92.50∗ | 0.05∗ |
| Cooperative-Assistance (IM2) | TANC | 100∗ | ||
| Cooperative-Clarification (IM3) | 100∗ | 85∗ | 92.50∗ | 0.11∗ |
| Cooperative-Exclamation (IM4) | TANC | 100∗ | ||
| Intrusive-Disagreement (IM5) | 87∗ | 83∗ | 85.00∗ | 0.03∗ |
| Intrusive-Floor taking (IM6) | TANC | 89∗ | ||
| Intrusive-Competition (IM7) | TANC | 100∗ | ||
| Intrusive-Topic change (IM8) | TANC | TANC | ||
| Intrusive-Tangentialization (IM9) | TANC | TANC | ||
| Neutral interruption (IM10) | 93∗ | 81∗ | 87.00∗ | 0.08∗ |
| Failed Interruption (IM11) | TANC | 90∗ | ||
TANC, Total Agreement in the Not Coded Category; scores are expressed in percentage; ∗Inter-judge reliability through Cohen’s kappa (κ); ∗∗Inter-judge reliability through Krippendorff’s canonical agreement coefficient (Cc); κ and Cc: insufficient (lower than or equal to 60%), substantial (between 61 and 80%), satisfactory (greater than or equal to 81%).