Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;176(9):1268–1281. doi: 10.1111/bph.14625

Figure 2.

Figure 2

High doses of WIN55,212‐2 decrease spontaneous locomotion. (a, b) The time course and AUC measurements after systemic administration of different doses of Δ9‐THC or vehicle in the open‐field test revealed a significant time main effect (two‐way ANOVA for repeated measures, F11, 77 = 5.93), but no significant Δ9‐THC treatment main effect (F 3, 21 = 2.30) or Treatment × Time interaction (F 33, 231 = 0.39). (c, d) In contrast, WIN55,212‐2 administration produced a more pronounced impairment of spontaneous movement in the open‐field test (two‐way ANOVA for repeated measures revealed a significant Time main effect (F 11,77 = 6.35), treatment main effect (F 3,21 = 7.08), and Treatment X Time interaction (F 33,231 = 1.97)), shown here by the time course for individual doses (c) and the AUC summary data (d)