Table 2.
Characteristics | Low Grade Dysplasia vs. No Neoplasm | High Grade Dysplasia/SCC vs. No Neoplasm | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95% CI | p | cOR | 95% CI | aOR | 95% CI | p | |
Age | ||||||||||
<50 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
≥50 | 1.7 | 1.0–2.9 | 1.8 | 1.1–3.1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.4–1.1 | 0.7 | 0.4–1.3 | 0.25 |
Smoking | ||||||||||
Non-smoker | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Smoker | 1.7 | 0.8–3.9 | 1.7 | 0.7–4.0 | 0.22 | 9.3 | 1.3–67.7 | 5.6 | 0.8–42.2 | 0.09 |
Alcohol | ||||||||||
Non-drinker | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Drinker | 3.0 | 1.5–5.9 | 3.4 | 1.7–7.0 | <0.01 | 23.9 | 3.3–173.4 | 21.3 | 2.9–156.6 | <0.01 |
Betel nut | ||||||||||
Non-chewer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Chewer | 0.8 | 0.5–1.4 | 0.6 | 0.4–1.1 | 0.09 | 1.1 | 0.6–2.0 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.1 | 0.08 |
Tea drinking | ||||||||||
Non-consumer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Consumer | 1.4 | 0.9–2.1 | 1.3 | 0.8–2.0 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | 0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | 0.03 |
Stage | ||||||||||
0–I | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
II | 1.2 | 0.6–2.7 | 1.4 | 0.6–3.0 | 0.45 | 2.3 | 0.6–9.5 | 2.8 | 0.7–11.7 | 0.16 |
III | 0.5 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.2 | 0.11 | 3.2 | 0.9–11.8 | 2.9 | 0.8–10.7 | 0.11 |
IV | 1.2 | 0.6–2.2 | 1.1 | 0.6–2.1 | 0.69 | 4.5 | 1.4–14.9 | 4.3 | 1.3–14.3 | 0.02 |
Abbreviations: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; cOR, crude odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. p value was tested with the logistic regression model for categorical variables for all the variables in the table.