Table 1.
List of papers investigating speech envelope tracking using various analysis approaches, data collection procedures, and topics of interest. Analysis abbreviations: CC—cross-correlation; PC—phase coherence; TRF—temporal response function; SR—stimulus reconstruction.
| Author/Year | Data | Analysis | Relevant Amplitude Envelope Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speech Intelligibility | |||
| Ahissar et al., 2001 [63] | MEG | CC | Phase-locking predicts speech comprehension |
| Luo and Poeppel, 2007 [112] | MEG | PC | Phase-locking to speech is robust at 4–8 Hz |
| Abrams et al., 2008 [69] | EEG | CC | Right-hemisphere dominance for phase-locking |
| Hertrich et al., 2012 [64] | MEG | CC | Phase-locking with right-lateralized peak at 100 ms |
| Ding and Simon, 2013 [49] | MEG | TRF | Phase-locking at <4 Hz remains stable in noise |
| Peelle et al., 2013 [32] | MEG | PC | Phase-locking is strongest at 4–7 Hz in intelligible speech |
| Ding et al., 2014 [113] | MEG | TRF/PC | Phase-locking at 1–4 Hz predicts speech comprehension |
| Millman et al., 2015 [114] | MEG | CC | Phase-locking at 4–7 Hz regardless of intelligibility |
| Power et al., 2016 [115] | EEG | SR | Reconstruction of vocoded speech is strongest at 0–2 Hz |
| Cocktail Party | |||
| Power et al., 2012 [61] | EEG | TRF | Attention elicits left-lateralized peak at 209 ms |
| Ding and Simon, 2012 [54] | MEG | SR | Attended speech phase-locks at <10 Hz around 100 ms lag |
| Zion Golumbic et al., 2013 [87] | ECoG | PC | Attended speech phase-locks at 1–7 Hz and 70–150 Hz |
| Horton et al., 2014 [50] | EEG | CC | Attended phase-locking improves with sample length |
| O’Sullivan et al., 2015 [83] | EEG | SR | Attended speech encodes maximally at 170–250 ms lag |
| O’Sullivan et al., 2017 [116] | ECoG | SR | Attention boosts reconstruction accuracy in dynamic switching |
| Audiovisual Speech | |||
| Crosse et al., 2015 [97] | EEG | SR | AV speech encodes better than A + V at 2–6 Hz |
| Crosse et al., 2016 [98] | EEG | SR | AV speech improves reconstruction in noise at <3 Hz |
| Park et al., 2016 [101] | MEG | PC | Cortical activity entrains to lip movements at 1–7 Hz |
| Linguistic Information | |||
| Di Liberto et al., 2015 [117] | EEG | SR | Cortical activity entrains to phonetic information |
| Ding et al., 2017 [118] | EEG | PC | Cortical activity entrains to multiple levels concurrently |
| Falk et al., 2017 [119] | EEG | PC | Phase-locking improves when rhythmic cue precedes speech |
| Broderick et al., 2018 [120] | EEG | TRF | Neural tracking depends on semantic congruency |
| Makov et al., 2017 [121] | EEG | PC | Phase-locking at 4 Hz during sleep, but not at higher levels |