Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;19:363. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5495-6

Table 3.

Survival outcomes according to risk scores at the first and second rounds of TACE

Risk scores Median survival (95% CI) Survival rate Cox regression
1-year 3-years 5-years HR (95% CI) P value*
At the first TACE (n = 619)
 mHAP-II
 A-B (n = 283) 43.7 (36.8–50.6) 89.8% 59.7% 40.1% 1
 C-D (n = 336) 21.5 (18.5–24.5) 65.7% 31.3% 16.8% 2.07 (1.71–2.50) <0.001
 mHAP
 A-B (n = 519) 35.2 (31.6–38.8) 83.6% 49.7% 30.8% 1
 C-D (n = 100) 10.2 (8.3–12.1) 40.2% 15.5% 9.3% 2.73 (2.17–3.45) <0.001
 HAP
 A-B (n = 394) 39.8 (35.3–44.3) 86.1% 53.9% 34.1% 1
 C-D (n = 225) 18.6 (14.2–23.0) 60.2% 27.4% 15.7% 2.01 (1.66–2.42) <0.001
At the second TACE (n = 514)
 mHAP-II
 A-B (n = 263) 38.6 (33.8–43.4) 86.5% 51.9% 33.3% 1
 C-D (n = 251) 17.2 (14.9–19.5) 60.3% 24.2% 11.2% 2.28 (1.86–2.80) <0.001
 mHAP
 A-B (n = 441) 30.0 (26.6–33.4) 78.9% 42.6% 25.0% 1
 C-D (n = 73) 8.5 (6.8–10.2) 39.4% 12.7% 7.0% 2.64 (2.02–3.44) <0.001
 HAP
 A-B (n = 337) 32.6 (27.8–37.4) 81.6% 46.5% 27.8% 1
 C-D (n = 177) 17.2 (14.0–20.4) 57.5% 22.8% 12.3% 1.97 (1.60–2.41) <0.001

P value* indicates a comparison with A-B class of risk scores

HAP hepatoma arterial-embolization prognostic, mHAP modified HAP, CI confidence interval, TACE trans-arterial chemoembolization