Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;19:67. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1285-7

Table 3.

Relationship between MMP-9 polymorphism and IS risk

SNP Model Genotype control case OR (95% CI) P-value AIC BIC
rs3787268 Codominant G/G 104 (41.9%) 77 (30.8%) 1.00 0.035* 689.7 702.3
G/A 104 (41.9%) 125 (50%) 1.62 (1.10–2.41)
A/A 40 (16.1%) 48 (19.2%) 1.62 (0.97–2.71)
Dominant G/G 104 (41.9%) 77 (30.8%) 1.00 0.009* 687.7 696.1
G/A-A/A 144 (58.1%) 173 (69.2%) 1.62 (1.12–2.35)
Recessive G/G-G/A 208 (83.9%) 202 (80.8%) 1.00 0.370 693.6 702
A/A 40 (16.1%) 48 (19.2%) 1.24 (0.78–1.96)
Overdominant G/G-A/A 144 (58.1%) 125 (50%) 1.00 0.071 691.1 699.5
G/A 104 (41.9%) 125 (50%) 1.38 (0.97–1.97)
Log-additive 1.33 (1.03–1.70) 0.026* 689.4 697.8
rs3918249 Co-dominant C/C 145 (58.2%) 155 (62.5%) 1.00 0.240 692.1 704.8
T/C 83 (33.3%) 81 (32.7%) 0.91 (0.62–1.34)
T/T 21 (8.4%) 12 (4.8%) 0.53 (0.25–1.13)
Dominant C/C 145 (58.2%) 155 (62.5%) 1.00 0.330 692 700.5
T/C-T/T 104 (41.8%) 93 (37.5%) 0.84 (0.58–1.20)
Recessive C/C-T/C 228 (91.6%) 236 (95.2%) 1.00 0.110 690.4 698.8
T/T 21 (8.4%) 12 (4.8%) 0.55 (0.27–1.15)
Over-dominant C/C-T/T 166 (66.7%) 167 (67.3%) 1.00 0.870 693 701.4
T/C 83 (33.3%) 81 (32.7%) 0.97 (0.67–1.41)
Log-additive 0.81 (0.61–1.08) 0.160 691 699.4
rs2274755 G/G 184 (73.9%) 191 (76.7%) 1.00 0.470 693.8 702.3
G/T 65 (26.1%) 58 (23.3%) 0.86 (0.57–1.29)
rs3918254 Co-dominant C/C 152 (61%) 152 (61%) 1.00 0.830 696 708.6
T/C 81 (32.5%) 84 (33.7%) 1.04 (0.71–1.52)
T/T 16 (6.4%) 13 (5.2%) 0.81 (0.38–1.75)
Dominant C/C 152 (61%) 152 (61%) 1.00 NA 694.4 702.8
T/C-T/T 97 (39%) 97 (39%) 1.00 (0.70–1.43)
Recessive C/C-T/C 233 (93.6%) 236 (94.8%) 1.00 0.570 694 702.5
T/T 16 (6.4%) 13 (5.2%) 0.80 (0.38–1.70)
Over-dominant C/C-T/T 168 (67.5%) 165 (66.3%) 1.00 0.780 694.3 702.7
T/C 81 (32.5%) 84 (33.7%) 1.06 (0.73–1.53)
Log-additive 0.97 (0.72–1.29) 0.820 694.3 702.7

ORs, odds ratios; CI: confidence interval; AIC: Akaike’s Information criterion; BIC: Bayesian Information criterion

*p value ≤0.05 indicates statistical significance