Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;17:65. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1132-y

Table 1.

Summary of the 25-participant’s socio-demographics, clinical features and themes explored

n = 25 %
Age (years)
  > 30 15 60
  < 30 10 40
Ethnicity (self-reported)
 Mixed Ancestry 7 28
 Black African 18 72
Educational level
 Below Secondary level 5 20
 Secondary level 10 40
 At college/university/job training 5 20
 Completed college/university/job training 5 20
Job status
 Employed 6 24
 Unemployed 17 68
 Student 2 8
 Disability grant recipients 6 24
Marital status
 Married 4 16
 Separated 3 12
 Single 18 72
SLE features
 Lupus nephritis 6 24
 Skin/discoid lupus 6 24
 Arthritis 25 100
Disease Activitya
 High disease activity 8 32
 Quiescent disease 17 68
Themes explored
 Physical Impairment:
  Pain 19 76
  Fatigue 17 68
 Emotional Health 25 100
 Employment 25 100
 Social functioning 8 32
 Sexuality 22 88
 Aesthetic concerns 20 80
 Fertility issues 14 56
 Adherence to treatment 11 44
 Coping mechanisms 21 84

aThe Physicians Global assessment of SLEDAI is a score of 1 to 4 in categories of 0 = No activity, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe [20]