Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 13;37(4):609–620. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00789-2

Table 3.

Clinical validity: one-way analysis of variance comparing mean EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D health utility index scores of caregivers with different demographic characteristics, n = 224

Caregiver measure n (%)a Caregiver quality of life measures [mean (SD)]
SF-6D index EQ-5D-3L index
Nightly hours of sleep
 ≤ 5 55 (25) 0.698 (0.13)* 0.777 (0.16)*
 6–7 132 (60) 0.749 (0.11)* 0.861 (0.13)*
 ≥ 8 34 (15) 0.780 (0.11)* 0.907 (0.10)*
CES-D
 ≥ 13.8 94 (46) 0.660 (0.08)* 0.778 (0.14)*
 < 13.8 109 (54) 0.812 (0.09)* 0.912 (0.10)*
CarerQol-7D
 < 75.5 78 (36) 0.676 (0.10)* 0.770 (0.14)*
 ≥ 75.5 137 (64) 0.779 (0.11)* 0.891 (0.12)*
FQLS
 < 100.9 80 (39) 0.689 (0.11)* 0.801 (0.13)*
 ≥ 100.9 124 (61) 0.774 (0.11)* 0.881 (0.13)*

Higher scores on the CES-D indicate worse problems; higher scores on the FQLS and CarerQol-7D indicate better quality of life

CarerQol-7D Care-related Quality of Life instrument, CES-D Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, EQ-5D-3L three-level EuroQoL-5 Dimension, FQLS Family Quality of Life Scale, SF-6D Short Form-6 Dimension

*p < 0.05 using Bonferroni correction factor such that groups with two, three, or four levels must exhibit a p value of 0.0500, 0.0167, and 0.0083, respectively

an values may not total to 224 due to missing responses