Table 3.
Correlates of total appendicular lean mass by age group. Fisher r-to-z transformations were performed to assess the significance of between-group differences in correlation coefficients
| Variable | Young (n = 50) | Older (n = 50) | Z score | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body composition | ||||
| Fat mass (kg) | − 0.16 | 0.45** | − 3.13 | 0.002 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 0.99** | 0.88** | 6.16 | < 0.001 |
| %TFM | − 0.56** | − 0.21 | − 2.03 | 0.042 |
| Strength, muscle quality and functional performance | ||||
| Dominant HGS (kg) | 0.78** | 0.79** | − 0.13 | 0.897 |
| Non-dominant HGS (kg) | 0.78** | 0.79** | − 0.13 | 0.897 |
| Dominant leg extension 1RM (kg) | 0.87** | 0.71** | 2.16 | 0.031 |
| Non-dominant leg extension 1RM (kg) | 0.83** | 0.74** | 1.15 | 0.250 |
| Upper-body MQ (kg/kg) | − 0.61** | − 0.31* | − 1.88 | 0.060 |
| Lower-body MQ (kg/kg) | 0.51** | − 0.04 | 2.92 | 0.004 |
| 6-m gait speed (m/s) | − 0.14 | 0.00 | − 0.68 | 0.497 |
| Physical activity | ||||
| Walking (min/week) | − 0.03 | − 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.490 |
| Moderate (min/week) | − 0.13 | − 0.21 | 0.40 | 0.689 |
| Vigorous (min/week) | 0.08 | 0.18 | − 0.49 | 0.624 |
| Total (MET-min/week) | − 0.03 | − 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.920 |
%TFM percentage tissue fat mass, 1RM one repetition maximum, ALM appendicular lean mass, HGS handgrip strength, MET metabolic equivalent, MQ muscle quality
*Significant at P < 0.05; **significant at P < 0.01