Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 26;119(5):1171–1181. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04107-8

Table 3.

Correlates of total appendicular lean mass by age group. Fisher r-to-z transformations were performed to assess the significance of between-group differences in correlation coefficients

Variable Young (n = 50) Older (n = 50) Z score P value
Body composition
Fat mass (kg) − 0.16 0.45** − 3.13 0.002
Lean mass (kg) 0.99** 0.88** 6.16 < 0.001
%TFM − 0.56** − 0.21 − 2.03 0.042
Strength, muscle quality and functional performance
Dominant HGS (kg) 0.78** 0.79** − 0.13 0.897
Non-dominant HGS (kg) 0.78** 0.79** − 0.13 0.897
Dominant leg extension 1RM (kg) 0.87** 0.71** 2.16 0.031
Non-dominant leg extension 1RM (kg) 0.83** 0.74** 1.15 0.250
Upper-body MQ (kg/kg) − 0.61** − 0.31* − 1.88 0.060
Lower-body MQ (kg/kg) 0.51** − 0.04 2.92 0.004
6-m gait speed (m/s) − 0.14 0.00 − 0.68 0.497
Physical activity
Walking (min/week) − 0.03 − 0.17 0.69 0.490
Moderate (min/week) − 0.13 − 0.21 0.40 0.689
Vigorous (min/week) 0.08 0.18 − 0.49 0.624
Total (MET-min/week) − 0.03 − 0.05 0.01 0.920

%TFM percentage tissue fat mass, 1RM one repetition maximum, ALM appendicular lean mass, HGS handgrip strength, MET metabolic equivalent, MQ muscle quality

*Significant at P < 0.05; **significant at P < 0.01