Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;47(5):865–879. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0497-4

Table 2.

Results from the assessment of longitudinal measurement invariance

X2 (df) SBΔX2 (Δdf) SB ΔX2p value CFI ΔCFI RMSEA [90% CI] ΔRMSEA SRMR ΔSRMR
Configural 219.244 (134) 0.986 0.018 [0.014, 0.022] 0.025
Metric 234.182 (146) 15.464 (12) 0.217 0.986 0.000 0.018 [0.013, 0.022] 0.000 0.027 0.002
Scalar 548.207 (158) 382.676 (12) 0.000 0.937 −0.049 0.036 [0.033, 0.039] 0.018 0.038 0.011
 Scalar partial 1a 431.045 (157) 237.621 (11) 0.000 0.955 −0.031 0.030 [0.027, 0.034] 0.012 0.035 0.008
 Scalar partial 2a 352.631 (156) 107.449 (10) 0.000 0.972 −0.014 0.024 [0.020, 0.027] 0.006 0.030 0.003
 Scalar partial 3a 267.571 (155) 37.734 (9) 0.000 0.982 −0.004 0.019 [0.015, 0.023] 0.001 0.028 0.001
 Scalar partial 4a 251.131 (154) 17.908 (8) 0.022 0.984 −0.002 0.018 [0.014, 0.022] 0.000 0.027 0.000

SB, Satorra-Bentler scaled; CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean residual

aModel comparisons are made with the metric invariance model