Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 22;24(5):575–582. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-01380-z

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for RFS, OS, and LRFS in cervical cancer patients treated with post-surgical CCRT

RFS OS LRFS
n 3-year RFS (%) 95% CI (%) p 3-year OS (%) 95% CI (%) p 3-year LRFS (%) 95% CI (%) p
Age (years)
 < 42 45 71 55–82 0.535 86 72–94 0.814 82 67–90 0.863
 ≥ 42 51 80 66–89 94 83–98 94 83–98
Smoker
 No 66 80 68–88 0.158 92 83–97 0.811 91 81–96 0.573
 Yes 30 66 46–80 86 67–95 83 64–93
FIGO
 IB–IIA 69 76 64–85 0.744 91 81–96 0.194 90 80–95 0.217
 IIB 27 74 53–87 89 69–96 85 65–94
Course of chemotherapy
 < 5 28 89 70–96 0.180 96 77–100 0.101 96 77–100 0.173
 ≥ 5 68 70 58–80 88 78–94 85 74–92
Parametrial invasion
 No 47 78 64–88 0.396 94 81–98 0.345 89 76–95 0.317
 Yes 49 73 58–83 87 74–94 88 74–94
Pelvic LNs
 0–1 38 87 71–94 0.049 89 74–96 0.508 87 71–94 0.700
 ≥ 2 58 69 55–79 91 80–96 90 78–95
Histology
 SCC 78 81 70–88 0.099 92 83–96 0.002 92 83–96 0.002
 AD/ADS 18 55 29–74 83 57–94 72 46–87
Dissected LNs
 < 40 43 72 55–83 0.498 86 71–93 0.533 81 66–90 0.322
 ≥ 40 53 79 65–88 94 83–98 94 83–98

RFS relapse-free survival, OS overall survival, LRFS locoregional relapse-free survival, CCRT concurrent chemoradiotherapy, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, LN lymph node, AD adenocarcinoma, ADS adenosquamous carcinoma