Table 2. Comparison between efficiency and throughput of m-HMC and c-NT methods.
Efficiency | Throughput (no./person/h) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | # | Successful enucleation | Aspirated Oocyte volume | Fusion | Enucleation | Donor cell addition | Fusion | Total throughput |
m-HMC | 195 | 91.3±6.0% a | 2.5±1.2% a | 95.3% a | 183 a | 160 a | 229 a | |
(2.0X) | (2.3X) | (2.6X) | (2.3X) | |||||
c-NT | 155 | 95.0±3.3% a | 2.0±1.5% a | 75.4% b | 93 b | 69 b | 88 b |
Male fibroblasts were used for this experiment.
X: Represents increased in throughput of different steps involved in SCNT.
a,b: Values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)