Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 14;11(5):375–382. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3799

Table 2. Comparison of Motor Assessment and Post-Stroke Complications Between the Independent Functional Recovery Group (n = 255) and Non-Functional Recovery Group (n = 103).

Characteristics Functional recovery
Non-functional recovery
P value
n % n %
Follow-up motor assessment
  MMT arm < 0.001**
    Grade 0 - 1 95 24.70 70 70.71
    Grade 2 - 3 94 37.45 24 24.24
    More than 3 + 62 37.85 5 5.05
  MMT leg < 0.001**
    Grade 0 - 1 47 18.73 62 62.63
    Grade 2 - 3 102 40.64 31 31.31
    More than 3 + 102 40.64 6 6.06
Stroke-related complications
  Aphasia < 0.001**
    Dysarthria 100 39.84 37 38.14
    Motor/sensory aphasia 31 12.35 9 0.001
    Global aphasia 24 9.56 24 9.28
Dysphagia 10 4.00 11 24.74 0.033*
Inattention 14 5.60 11 11.22 0.107
Apraxia 4 1.57 1 0.97 1.000
Depression 9 3.60 9 9.18 0.042*
Other complications < 0.001**
  One complication 50 20.08 24 24.24
  Two or more complications 21 8.43 23 23.23

MMT: manual muscle testing; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001.