Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Health. 2018 Aug 25;26(3):448–459. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1514457

Table 2.

Logistic regression model of the preference for patient–provider ethnic concordance.

 Odds ratio [95% confidence interval]
Age
  18–39 1.0 [reference]
  40–59 1.49 [1.13–1.95]**
  60+ 2.07 [1.45–2.94]***
Gender
  Male 1.0 [reference]
  Female 0.96 [0.78–1.17]
Ethnicity
  Chinese 1.0 [reference]
  Asian Indian 0.63 [0.46–0.87]**
  Korean 1.07 [0.79–1.46]
  Vietnamese 0.75 [0.51–1.09]
  Filipino 0.49 [0.30–0.79]**
Marital status
  Not married 1.0 [reference]
  Married 1.29 [1.02–1.63]*
Education
  <12 years 1.0 [reference]
  ≥12 years 0.78 [0.57–1.05]
Chronic medical condition
  None 1.0 [reference]
  ≥1 1.04 [0.81–1.34]
Self-rated health
  Excellent/very good/good 1.0 [reference]
  Fair/poor 1.39 [0.95–2.03]
Health insurance coverage
  Not insured 1.0 [reference]
  Insured 1.11 [0.82–1.50]
Place of birth
  US-born 1.0 [reference]
  Foreign-born 1.18 [0.78–1.76]
Time in the US
  ≥10 years 1.0 [reference]
  <10 years 1.61 [1.22–2.10]**
English proficiency
  Proficient 1.0 [reference]
  Limited 1.64 [1.28–2.09]***
Acculturation
  High 1.0 [reference]
  Low 1.52 [1.19–1.93]**
Perceived discrimination
  No 1.0 [reference]
  Yes 1.14 [0.91–1.43]
Communication problems in healthcare settings
  No 1.0 [reference]
  Yes 3.74 [2.88–4.85]***
Summary statistic −2 Log likelihood = 2375.3
  χ2(19) = 530.6***
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.