Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 20;20(5):812–822. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0545

Table 4. Diagnostic Performance in Overall and Subgroup Analysis for Evaluating Pathologic Fractures in Two Readers Using 5-Point Scale.

CE set (%) DW set (%) Combined set (%) P
CE set vs. DW set DW set vs. Combined set CE set vs. Combined set
Overall (n = 98)
 Reader 1
  Sensitivity 98.0 93.9 98.0 0.63 0.50 1.0
  Specificity 71.4 81.6 93.9 0.36 0.07 0.001*
  Accuracy 84.7 87.8 95.9 0.21 0.34 0.003*
 Reader 2
  Sensitivity 98.0 95.9 94.9 1.00 1.00 0.63
  Specificity 85.7 89.8 98.0 0.73 0.13 0.07
  Accuracy 91.8 92.9 95.9 0.55 0.13 0.04*
Single bone abnormality (n = 25)
 Reader 1
  Sensitivity 93.7 93.8 100.0 1.00 1.00 1.0
  Specificity 44.4 77.8 77.8 0.38 1.00 0.25
  Accuracy 76.0 88.0 92.0 0.45 1.00 0.63
 Reader 2
  Sensitivity 93.8 93.8 100.0 1.00 1.00 1.0
  Specificity 77.8 88.9 100.0 1.00 1.00 0.5
  Accuracy 88.0 92.0 100.0 1.00 1.00 1.0
Absent extra-osseous soft tissue component (n = 82)
 Reader 1
  Sensitivity 97.1 91.2 97.1 0.63 0.50 1.0
  Specificity 72.9 83.3 95.8 0.36 0.07 0.001*
  Accuracy 82.9 86.6 96.3 0.21 0.34 0.003*
 Reader 2
  Sensitivity 97.1 94.1 91.2 1.00 1.00 0.63
  Specificity 85.4 89.6 98.0 0.73 0.13 0.07
  Accuracy 90.2 91.5 95.1 0.55 0.13 0.039*
Present fracture site enhancement (n = 90)
 Reader 1
  Sensitivity 98.0 93.9 98.0 0.63 0.50 1.0
  Specificity 68.3 80.5 92.7 0.33 0.13 0.002*
  Accuracy 84.4 87.8 95.6 0.19 0.51 0.006*
 Reader 2
  Sensitivity 98.0 95.9 93.9 1.00 1.00 0.63
  Specificity 83.0 90.2 97.6 0.45 0.25 0.07
  Accuracy 91.1 93.3 95.6 0.34 0.22 0.04*

*Indicated significant difference between two groups. CEFST1 = contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted imaging, CE set = NEMR plus CEFST1, Combined set = DWI plus NEMR plus CEFST1, DW set = DWI plus NEMR, NEMR = non-enhanced MRI