Table 4.
Comparison of the TCM syndrome score at the baseline and after TFS treatment.
| Category | Time (Week) |
mean(SD) | Min, Max | T test(P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCM syndrome | baseline | 5.15(2.20) | 0, 15 | — |
| 3 | 4.51(2.35) | 0, 13 | -14.36(<0.0001) | |
| 8/9 | 3.84(2.10) | 0, 13 | -22.25(<0.0001) | |
| Weight | baseline | 60.59(8.79) | 41, 105 | — |
| 3 | 63.58(9.79) | 41, 105 | 0.28(0.7568) | |
| 8/9 | 64.25(9.25) | 41, 105 | 3.26(0.0023) | |
| ECOG∗2 | baseline | — | — | — |
| 3 | -0.04(0.28) | -1,1 | -436.0(0.0035) | |
| 8/9 | -0.05(0.32) | -1,1 | -767.5(0.0013) | |
| FACT-L (Physiology) |
baseline | 18.67(4.56) | 3, 26 | — |
| 3 | 0.25(2.45) | -10, 17 | 3.25(0.0015) | |
| 8/9 | 1.02(3.62) | -10, 17 | 7.85(<0.0001) | |
| FACT-L (Social/Family ) |
baseline | 17.23(3.45) | 6, 27 | — |
| 3 | 17.98(3.89) | 6, 29 | 1.08(0.2645) | |
| 8/9 | 18.15(3.87) | 5, 28 | 5.56(<0.0001) | |
| FACT-L (Emotion ) |
baseline | 14.23(3.87) | 0, 28 | — |
| 3 | 14.89(3.98) | 2, 24 | 6.12(<0.0001) | |
| 8/9 | 15.23(4.33) | 3, 27 | 9.87(<0.0001) | |
| FACT-L (Function) |
baseline | 14.23(5.45) | 0,28 | — |
| 3 | 15.76(5.25) | 0,29 | 6.23(<0.0001) | |
| 8/9 | 16.56(5.65) | 0,29 | 11.56(<0.0001) | |
| FACT-L (Pain) |
baseline | 0.87(1.08) | 0,8 | — |
| 3 | 0.86(0.78) | 0,6 | -4.56(0.0005) | |
| 8/9 | 0.87(1.21) | 0,21 | -4.78(<0.0001) | |
| FACT-L (Additional attention) |
baseline | 22.45(5.12) | 4,36 | — |
| 3 | 24.56(5.12) | 4,37 | 6.67(<0.0001) | |
| 8/9 | 26.78(5.02) | 4,37 | 10.12(<0.0001) |
2Signed rank sum test.
TCM syndrome: traditional Chinese medicine syndrome; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FACT-L: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung.