Table 2.
Responses to self-evaluation of computer literacy from different participant groups.
| Participant group | Very low, n | Low, n | Medium, n | High, n | Very high, n | |
| Community advisory board | ||||||
|
|
Level of computer literacy | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
Knowledge of the TasPa trial | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
Awareness of the dashboard project | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Nursing staff | ||||||
|
|
Level of computer literacy | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
Knowledge of the TasP trial | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
|
|
Awareness of the dashboard project | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Operational staff | ||||||
|
|
Level of computer literacy | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
|
Knowledge of the TasP trial | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
|
Awareness of the dashboard project | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Scientific staff | ||||||
|
|
Level of computer literacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
|
|
Knowledge of the TasP trial | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
|
|
Awareness of the dashboard project | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
aTasP: Treatment as Prevention.