Table 6.
mRNA expression level in liver (Experiment 2).
| C | M | C + E | M + E | Interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid synthesis | Acc | 1.00 ± 0.19 b | 0.77 ± 0.07 a,b | 0.85 ± 0.10 b | 0.39 ± 0.04 a | M, E |
| Fasn | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | ||
| Me | 1.00 ± 0.14 | 1.25 ± 0.14 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | 1.14 ± 0.10 | ||
| G6pdx | 1.00 ± 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 1.21 ± 0.09 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | E | |
| Srebp1c | 1.00 ± 0.11 | 0.86 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.12 | ||
| β-oxidation | Aco | 1.00 ± 0.09 b | 0.93 ± 0.07 b | 0.81 ± 0.07 b | 0.39 ± 0.05 a | M, E, M × E |
| Pparα | 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | ||
| Cholesterol synthesis | Hmgcr | 1.00 ± 0.19 b | 0.63 ± 0.12 a,b | 0.92 ± 0.15 b | 0.39 ± 0.07 a | M |
| Cholesterol catabolism | Cyp7a1 | 1.00 ± 0.11 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | 1.02 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.12 |
Values are mean ± SE, n = 10. Because there were two factors of miso and exercise, statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and for items with significant differences one-way ANOVA was performed and followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. a,b Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05. Miso diet effect, exercise effect and interaction were described at the right side of the table: M, miso diet effect; E, exercise effect; M × E, interaction.