Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;11(3):554. doi: 10.3390/nu11030554

Table 6.

Correlations between FFQv and FFQr (Reproducibility).

Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient
Crude Energy-Adjusted (Residual) 1 Energy-Adjusted (Density) 2 ICC for FFQ
r 95%CI r 95%CI r 95%CI
Cohort I
Men (n = 101)
Total sugars 3 0.61 (0.48, 0.72) 0.53 (0.38, 0.66) 0.63 (0.49, 0.73) 0.66
Glucose 0.65 (0.52, 0.75) 0.55 (0.40, 0.68) 0.64 (0.51, 0.74) 0.63
Fructose 0.65 (0.52, 0.75) 0.56 (0.41, 0.68) 0.60 (0.46, 0.71) 0.61
Galactose 0.73 (0.62, 0.81) 0.42 (0.24, 0.57) 0.66 (0.53, 0.76) 0.67
Sucrose 0.75 (0.65, 0.82) 0.70 (0.59, 0.79) 0.76 (0.67, 0.83) 0.75
Maltose 0.58 (0.43, 0.69) 0.68 (0.56, 0.77) 0.68 (0.56, 0.78) 0.50
Lactose 0.63 (0.50, 0.74) 0.51 (0.35, 0.64) 0.53 (0.37, 0.65) 0.50
Starch 0.69 (0.57, 0.78) 0.62 (0.49, 0.73) 0.51 (0.35, 0.64) 0.46
Energy 0.47 (0.30, 0.61)
Protein 0.56 (0.40, 0.68) 0.47 (0.30, 0.61) 0.56 (0.41, 0.68) 0.60
Fat 0.51 (0.35, 0.64) 0.60 (0.46, 0.72) 0.59 (0.44, 0.70) 0.59
Carbohydrate 0.66 (0.53, 0.76) 0.65 (0.52, 0.75) 0.60 (0.46, 0.71) 0.54
Women (n = 108)
Total sugars 3 0.65 (0.52, 0.75) 0.57 (0.43, 0.69) 0.55 (0.41, 0.67) 0.62
Glucose 0.69 (0.57, 0.78) 0.55 (0.41, 0.67) 0.61 (0.48, 0.72) 0.63
Fructose 0.65 (0.53, 0.75) 0.55 (0.40, 0.67) 0.60 (0.47, 0.71) 0.63
Galactose 0.59 (0.45, 0.70) 0.51 (0.36, 0.64) 0.52 (0.37, 0.64) 0.54
Sucrose 0.67 (0.55, 0.76) 0.61 (0.48, 0.72) 0.61 (0.48, 0.72) 0.59
Maltose 0.69 (0.57, 0.77) 0.64 (0.51, 0.74) 0.67 (0.54, 0.76) 0.68
Lactose 0.74 (0.64, 0.82) 0.74 (0.64, 0.82) 0.75 (0.65, 0.82) 0.71
Starch 0.71 (0.60, 0.79) 0.56 (0.42, 0.68) 0.60 (0.46, 0.71) 0.56
Energy 0.69 (0.58, 0.78)
Protein 0.68 (0.56, 0.77) 0.42 (0.25, 0.56) 0.49 (0.33, 0.62) 0.47
Fat 0.67 (0.55, 0.76) 0.58 (0.44, 0.69) 0.59 (0.46, 0.70) 0.59
Carbohydrate 0.72 (0.62, 0.80) 0.55 (0.40, 0.67) 0.58 (0.44, 0.69) 0.57
Cohort II
Men (n = 143)
Total sugars 3 0.63 (0.52, 0.72) 0.65 (0.55, 0.74) 0.66 (0.55, 0.74) 0.64
Glucose 0.71 (0.62, 0.78) 0.63 (0.52, 0.72) 0.66 (0.55, 0.74) 0.63
Fructose 0.64 (0.53, 0.73) 0.61 (0.50, 0.71) 0.62 (0.51, 0.71) 0.63
Galactose 0.72 (0.63, 0.79) 0.68 (0.57, 0.76) 0.69 (0.60, 0.77) 0.76
Sucrose 0.68 (0.58, 0.76) 0.67 (0.57, 0.75) 0.68 (0.57, 0.76) 0.67
Maltose 0.63 (0.51, 0.72) 0.67 (0.57, 0.75) 0.68 (0.58, 0.76) 0.78
Lactose 0.68 (0.58, 0.76) 0.69 (0.60, 0.77) 0.70 (0.60, 0.77) 0.64
Starch 0.69 (0.59, 0.77) 0.64 (0.54, 0.73) 0.62 (0.51, 0.71) 0.64
Energy 0.59 (0.47, 0.69)
Protein 0.60 (0.49, 0.70) 0.61 (0.50, 0.70) 0.60 (0.49, 0.70) 0.68
Fat 0.56 (0.44, 0.66) 0.63 (0.52, 0.72) 0.61 (0.50, 0.70) 0.64
Carbohydrate 0.64 (0.53, 0.73) 0.69 (0.59, 0.77) 0.66 (0.56, 0.75) 0.70
Women (n = 146)
Total sugars 3 0.64 (0.53, 0.73) 0.59 (0.47, 0.68) 0.63 (0.52, 0.72) 0.48
Glucose 0.60 (0.49, 0.70) 0.41 (0.26, 0.54) 0.45 (0.32, 0.57) 0.45
Fructose 0.58 (0.46, 0.67) 0.36 (0.21, 0.50) 0.45 (0.31, 0.57) 0.45
Galactose 0.65 (0.55, 0.74) 0.61 (0.50, 0.71) 0.65 (0.55, 0.74) 0.55
Sucrose 0.63 (0.52, 0.72) 0.53 (0.41, 0.64) 0.57 (0.45, 0.67) 0.55
Maltose 0.69 (0.60, 0.77) 0.71 (0.62, 0.78) 0.69 (0.59, 0.76) 0.65
Lactose 0.76 (0.68, 0.82) 0.79 (0.72, 0.84) 0.79 (0.72, 0.85) 0.73
Starch 0.53 (0.40, 0.64) 0.51 (0.38, 0.62) 0.58 (0.46, 0.68) 0.56
Energy 0.60 (0.48, 0.69)
Protein 0.65 (0.54, 0.73) 0.52 (0.39, 0.63) 0.59 (0.47, 0.69) 0.54
Fat 0.60 (0.48, 0.69) 0.51 (0.38, 0.62) 0.50 (0.36, 0.61) 0.37
Carbohydrate 0.58 (0.46, 0.68) 0.50 (0.37, 0.61) 0.50 (0.37, 0.62) 0.48

DR, dietary record; FFQv, food frequency questionnaire for validity; r, correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient. 1 Sugar and other nutrients intakes were adjusted for energy intake by residual model. 2 Sugar and other nutrients intakes were energy-adjusted using the density method (percentage of energy). 3 “Total sugars” represents the sum of the crude consumption of the following saccharides: glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, maltose, and lactose.