Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;10(15):4293–4305. doi: 10.1039/c9sc00172g

Fig. 6. Binding energies of Cl and 99TcO4 with SCU-COF-1. (a) The Cl residence probability distribution within SCU-COF-1 in the control simulations (left) and the most preferential binding configuration of Cl to SCU-COF-1 (right top). The 99TcO4 binding configuration yielded by substituting Cl with 99TcO4 (right bottom). (b) Binding energies of Cl (green) and 99TcO4 (red) with SCU-COF-1 by computing their potential of mean force (PMF) profiles moving from their binding sites to the bulk water. The inset figure displays the reaction coordinate in the PMF calculation.

Fig. 6