Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 15;11(3):633. doi: 10.3390/nu11030633

Table A2.

Quality assessment of included cell culture studies (adapted from WCRF/UoB recommendations) [22].

Author, Year Source 1 Experimental Conditions Selective Reporting 6 Total
Culture Conditions 2 Replicates 3 Controls 4 Multiple Cell Lines 5
Fu, 2014 [44] 1 1 0 1 1 1 5
Gong, 2016 [40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Gunasekera, 2007 [41] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Ivanov, 2007 [32] 1 1 0 1 1 0 4
Linnewiel-Hermoni, 2015 [33] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Liu, 2006 [34] 1 1 1 0 1 1 5
Liu, 2008 [35] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Peternac, 2008 [36] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Rafi, 2013 [37] 1 1 1 1 0 1 5
Richards, 2003 [38] 1 0 1 1 0 0 3
Tang, 2005 [42] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
Tang, 2011 [43] 1 1 1 1 1 0 5
Zhang, 2010 [39] 1 1 0 1 0 0 3

Studies are given a score of 0 or 1 for each of the following parameters (a score of 0 was given for a lack of criteria fulfillment or failure to report): 1 cell lines are independently validated; 2 comparable culture conditions to other studies; 3 experiment performed in replicate(s); 4 appropriate controls included; 5 more than one cell line used; 6 all experimental results are reported (a score of 0 was given for missing statistical data).