Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 18;24(6):1067. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061067

Table 1.

Mean % content a of the metabolites (indicators) in the lipid fraction of milk samples. The p-value of the t-test is reported b,c.

Metabolite OR Samples OP Samples CR Samples CP Samples
(9-cis, 11-trans) 18:2 CLA d 0.49 ± 0.06 0.51 ± 0.06 0.30 ± 0.08 0.31 ± 0.03
p-value b 3.98 × 10−9
p-value c 2.56 × 10−11
Caproleic acid 0.25 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.04 0.33 ± 0.03
p-value b 3.47 × 10−5
p-value c 4.72 × 10−12
α-linolenic acid 0.92 ± 0.08 0.88 ± 0.08 0.65 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.05
p-value b 4.32 × 10−18
p-value c 2.45 × 10−12
Linoleic acid 2.67 ± 0.35 2.66 ± 0.22 1.72 ± 0.24 1.73 ± 0.11
p-value b 1.12 × 10−15
p-value c 9.23 × 10−15
–CH2–CH=CH– 54.71 ± 2.68 54.47 ± 2.47 46.79 ± 3.45 47.98 ± 1.96
p-value b 9.38 × 10−9
p-value c 1.61 × 10−9
UFA 28.00 ± 1.19 28.07 ± 1.36 24.33 ± 1.75 24.32 ± 1.22
p-value b 7.48 × 10−8
p-value c 1.30 × 10−8

a Expressed as (mean value) ± SD. b Comparison between organic raw (OR) and conventional raw (CR) samples. c Comparison between organic processed (OP) and conventional processed (CP) a samples. d The contribution of the H10 resonance of the (10-trans, 12-cis) 18:2 CLA positional isomer at δ = 6.28 ppm [43] and of the H10 resonance of the (9-trans, 11-cis) 18:2 CLA isomer at 6.29 ppm [44] was found to be of minor importance.