Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 18;20:78. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1688-1

Table 1.

Comparison of run time, memory, and storage space between Bazam and alternative processes for realignment. Timings encompass the end to end process starting from read extraction and ending with completion of realigned and sorted BAM files

Tool Storage used Memory Effective Cores Time
Sort-Extract-Realign 282 GB 20 GB 16 13 h, 15 min
Picard SamToFastq 148 GB 78 GB 16 16 h, 14 min
Biobambam bamtofastq 149 GB 30 GB 16 15 h 30 min
Bazam (no sharding) 68 GB 28 GB 16 14 h, 55 min
Bazam 10-way sharding 102 GB 20 GB 160 1 h, 11 min