Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 10;222:436–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.043

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Histogram showing variation in the consumption carbon footprint (CFPCons) for the China case as a result of varying the breastmilk substitute (BMS) recipe. Dashed and dotted lines represent the range including 50% and 95% of simulation outcomes, respectively, and the solid line represents the sample median. The carbon footprint of the baseline recipe is indicated by a red diamond.