Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):212–216. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_424_17

Table 3.

Comparison of the optical coherence tomography measurements between the patient and control groups

Variable Patient (n=22) Control (n=22) P
rnflrights* 122.42±30.91 118.59±16.92 0.697
rnflrighti* 126.17±22.00 124.64±17.62 0.826
rnflrightn# 85.5 (60/146) 76 (33/185) 0.606
rnflrightte* 71.75±14.21 72.95±15.43 0.825
rnflrighttot* 102.92±19.72 101.64±15.84 0.838
rnfllefts* 124.60±23.53 121.58±13.62 0.642
rnfllefti# 127 (101/157) 125 (105/159) 0.918
rnflleftn# 80 (21/105) 81 (61/130) 0.973
rnflleftte# 77 (48/122) 67 (52/123) 0.202
rnfllefttot# 102 (70/192) 97 (82/119) 0.632
gclrights# 91.96 (42.87/112.29) 92.05 (64.90/107.84) 0.435
gclrighti# 94.15 (45.51/109.64) 94.23 (71.00/114.78) 0.339
gclrightto# 94.01 (46.03/109.82) 93.49 (67.95/111.21) 0.378
gcllefts# 93.45 (59.39/108.13) 92.94 (82.63/111.52) 0.762
gcllefti# 95.91 (51.21/107.93) 95.97 (83.67/117.32) 0.534
gclleftto# 95.41 (59.21/108.02) 93.73 (83.14/114.44) 0.851

Rnfl=Retinal nerve fiber layer analysis, gcl=Ganglion cell thickness s=Superior, i=Inferior, te=Temporal, *=Mean ± standard deviation, #=Median (minimum/maximum)