Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 18;9:6248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42723-8

Figure 6.

Figure 6

In vitro response of the hypocotyls and epicotyls of the Czerwona cultivar on different media. B5 I H – Gamborg Medium, variant I, hypocotyl; B5 II H – Gamborg Medium, variant II, hypocotyl; B5 III H – Gamborg Medium, variant III, hypocotyl; B5 IV H – Gamborg Medium, variant IV, hypocotyl; B5 I E – Gamborg Medium, variant I, epicotyl; B5 II E – Gamborg Medium, variant II, epicotyl; B5 III E – Gamborg Medium, variant III, epicotyl; B5 IV E – Gamborg Medium, variant IV, epicotyl; MS I H – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant I, hypocotyl; MS II H – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant II, hypocotyl; MS III H – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant III, hypocotyl; MS IV H – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant IV, hypocotyl; MS I E – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant I, epicotyl; MS II E – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant II, epicotyl; MS III E – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant III, epicotyl; MS IV E – Murashige-Skoog Medium, variant IV, epicotyl.