Upper panel: in the PVN, there was a significant effect of fear conditioning on OT neurons activation (P = 0.0465), with a significantly greater percentage of activated OT neurons in rats exposed to foot shocks alone in comparison with control rats (*P < 0.05). OT neurons within the SON were significantly activated in response to fear conditioning (P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA), with a greater percentage of OT neurons co-expressing cFos in rats exposed to un-signaled foot shocks compared with control rats (****P < 0.0001), as well as in rats exposed to foot shocks signaled by a cue compared with controls (**P < 0.01). Finally, there was a greater activation of OT neurons in response to foot shocks alone vs. foot shocks signaled by a cue in the SON (***P < 0.001). Fear conditioning activated OT neurons in the AN (****P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA), with a significantly greater percentage of activated OT neurons in rats exposed to unsignaled foot shocks (****P < 0.0001) and in rats exposed to foot shocks signaled by a cue (*P = 0.0168), compared with control rats. Bottom panel: although control rats show little co-expression of OT (green, open arrows) and cFos (red, closed arrows) in the PVN (A), rats exposed to foot shocks alone (A’), but not foot shocks signaled by a cue (A”), show increase in percentage of OT neurons co-expressing cFos in the PVN. In the SON, number of OT neurons co-expressing cFos was significantly increased in response to unsignaled foot shocks (B’) as well as foot shocks signaled by a cue (B”), in comparison with control rats (B). In the AN, percentage of OT neurons co-expressing cFos was increased in response to foot shocks alone (C’) as well as foot shocks signaled by a cue (C”), in comparison with control rats (C”, magnification ×60, scale bar 50 μm)