Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD007871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007871.pub3

4. Continous outcome data: total PRBC transfusion.

Study Reported unit Data available Intervention results Control results P value for
difference between groups
Ak 2009 Units Median (IQR) 1 (0; 1) 1 (1; 2) 0.599
Avidan 2004 mL Median (IQR) 500 (0; 678) 495 (0; 612) 0.03
Cui 2010 Units Median (IQR) 1 (1; 1) 1 (0.7; 1.9) > 0.05
Girdauskas 2010 Units Median (IQR) 6 (2; 13) 9 (4; 14) 0.20
Kempfert 2011
Kultufan Turan 2006 Units Median (IQR) 0 (0; 3) 1 (0; 2) 0.100
Nakayama 2015 mL/kg Mean (IQR) 22 (11; 34) 30 (20; 39) 0.02
NCT00772239
Nuttal 2001 Units Median (range) 2 (0; 9) 3 (0; 70) 0.039
Paniagua 2011 mL Mean (SD) 1774 (1394) 1604 (1366)
Rauter 2007 Units Mean 0.8 1.3 *
Royston 2001
Schaden 2012 Units Mean (SD) 3.1 (2.1) 4.8 (3.0) 0.12
Shore‐Lesserson 1999 mL Mean (SD) 354 (487) 475 (593) 0.12
Wang 2010 Units Mean (SD) 14.2 (7.1) 16.7 (12.8) > 0.05
Weber 2012 Units Median (IQR) 3 (2; 6) 5 (4; 9) < 0.001
Westbrook 2009 Units Total 14 33 **

*P value is reported as < 0.05, but seems to be calculated based on units given to each group instead of mean/median, thereby wrongly assuming that each of the units given are independent; **P value is reported as 0.12, but is calculated based on units given to each group instead of mean/median, thereby wrongly assuming that each of the units given are independent; ‐ indicates that data were not reported; significant result is highlighted with bold text.
 IQR: interquartile range; PRBC: pooled red blood cell; SD: standard deviation